Rulings by Advance Authorities

Select year
Sl. NO. Name of Applicant Name of State/UT Question(s) on which Advance Ruling Sought Order No. & Date View Category as per Section 97(2) of SGST Act
3 Barbeque Nation Hospitality Ltd Karnataka The applicant raises the objection for charging GST on the Electricity charges and questions the lessors about the legal authority/ source of law hence the application filed by the Applicant for advance ruling is here by rejected, in terms of Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017. 3 dated 09-01-2020 View 97 (2) (e)
2 SLN Tech-Fabs(Bengaluru) Pvt. Ltd. Karnataka 1. Presently we are charging GST 28% (CGST @ 14% + SGST @ 14%) as per Sl.No. 169 of Schedule-IV to the Notification No.1/2017-CT (R) dated 28.06.2017. Is it correct? 2. Can we use SAC 998881 (Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, Sl.No.535 of Annexure? Please confirm. 3. Can we start charging GST 12% (CGST @ 6% + SGST @ 6%) as per Sl.No.(i)(a)(vi)(n)(id) of Notification No.20/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 30.09.2019. 2 dated 07-01-2020 View 97 (2) (a) (e)
1 HACH DHR India Pvt. Ltd Karnataka Whether the applicants are correct in contending that the “Reagents” used by the applicant for laboratory testing of water samples should be classified under Sl.No.80 of the IGST schedule-II at 12% under IGST Notification No.1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017?.But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 02-01-2020 1 dated 07-01-2020 View 97 (2) (a)